For those of us who hack away in the rhetorical jungles, “circumlocution” is easy to identify: it’s the overuse of words, the total rejection of a rhetorical technique known as Occam’s Razor. William of Occam, a fourteenth-century philosopher, defined it as choosing the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions. Shorter is sweeter. Windbags can’t compete on equal terms.
A 21st century way of telling direct response writers what to do and what to don’t is to warn against “diarrhea of the fingertips,” losing impact with each succeeding overuse of adjectives, adverbs, and unjustified opinions. Circumlocution? You’d be right in the middle of it.
Flesh hangs loose, and impact gets squished. Would you write, “an unmarried single bachelor without a wife”? That’s beyond even total ineptness.
Ah, but how about repetitions that do little damage verbally but betray ineptness in print?
How about repeating a word because stronger support doesn’t come to mind? “This is very very good” isn’t as good as “This is very good” which in turn isn’t on a par with a specific — “This is tasty” or “This offers a prime fit” or “Superlative? Yes.” Want a quickie definition? Circumlocution is description that beats around the bush.
Combining Methods Adds Excitement, Avoids Circumlocution
Obviously, order-filling capability can be a major factor in attracting business volume. For some marketers, exploiting three-way availability builds the buying impulse:
- Come in and grab yours now, including daily unadvertised specials.
- Order here, online, and we’ll deliver. Free shipping.
- Order right now to be sure we’ll have what you want ready for you. Then stop by and pick up your order, any day XX:XX a.m. to XX:XX p.m.
As a “goosing” mechanism, offer something extra for what you can show as an extra buyer-effort — such as a bonus gift.
Here’s an online offer. In giant type: “A New Survey is Available”
Reaction? Blah. Truth (or at least ostensible truth) is a factor but seldom the key to conviction or motivation. Without a motivator, availability is less than weak because it denies uniqueness rather than suggesting uniqueness. A direct response version would have had a “You” implication, if only because in a selling circumstance, description is a thin competitor against salesmanship.
The first two sentences that follow the heading: “The latest Harris Panel survey is now open and we want your opinion! Complete the survey to earn points and trade them in for items in our catalog.”
Yes, that’s an instruction, and instructions qualify as motivators. But “Complete the survey,” without identification, is circumlocution. Want to maximize instead of wandering around the availability? Jump to the payoff. Completing the survey is a method, not a goal.
Repeating, so messages whose intent is to establish, cement, or make profitable a relationship with the individual or business at whom it’s aimed will hit closer to the bulls-eye: Jump to the payoff.
The result: Response will go up. Isn’t that why we make the contact?
So the sales logic, with a nod to the Clarity Commandment: Why circumlocute when you’re at point-blank range? If you want verification, just ask Tooden.
