Sure, this technique might work on people in the market right now. Which misses 98 percent of conversational opportunities.
Persuading clients in cold emails doesn’t work. Writing in ways that provoke a discussion that eventually helps customers convince themselves does.
Instead, Try This
It’s difficult to understand what will start a discussion with large numbers of decision makers — in a one-to-many email campaign. But instead of pushing research at them experiment to discover effective provocations using a one-to-one, tailored (personalized) campaign.
It’s easier to develop a targeted (one-to-many) campaign sequence (that works) once you have a proven tailored (one-to-one) provocation identified.
“Where you’ve had success with one-off (one-to-one) emails, try to ‘reverse-engineer’ them into email templates you can send out in bulk,” says Morgan.
I recommend exploiting case studies as a provocation method. Succinct, data-driven success stories are often a scale-able (one-to-many) communications technique to spark curiosity. For example:
“Recently, Neiman Marcus reduced IT costs by 36%. They are reinvesting this cash in new e-commerce infrastructure – driving maximum TCO. Are you open to hearing how they did this?”
“What we say about ourselves (typical Marketing stuff) is usually average at best,” says prospecting trainer John Barrows who believes what clients say is highly provocative.
“As sales professionals we need to learn about the real value we bring to our clients from their perspective and be able to share those stories to attract new ones,” he says.
Dig Up Success Stories
Don’t have case studies? No excuse. Barrows says, “Call up some of your existing clients and ask them ‘if someone were to ask you about the value you get from our solutions what would you say?’ and try to get a concrete result out of them.”
Once you do, Barrows says get to work. Start making calls to similar companies, ” … and say something like ‘The reason for my call today is we recently showed xyz company in your industry how to (results) and I wanted to see if this was something you’d be interested in talking about.'”
Bottom line: Pushing research as a conversation-starter works less and less. Telling prospects, “You should consider my solution because this research says so” is a non-starter. Pushing information at customers works far less than provoking them.
What is your experience?
Jeff, you bring up some very valid points. Selling to a cold contact is extremely challenging and hitting them with a “solution” before diagnosing the “problem” is basically sales malpractice. By piquing their interest with “… are you open to hearing how they did this?” brings about a potential conversation instead of just data dumping them with “research” which is just flat out boring.
Agreed, Art. It borders on absurd… the use of citing research as a means to cite a conversation. Don’t you think? Makes no sense from a psychological perspective.